×
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Streamer Products That Caused Massive Controversy

Not every successful streamer is content with just hopping on the internet to game or chat every day. Content creation is already enough of a hustle as it is, but many of the top names in the industry still frequently make moves to branch out to different areas of business. By diversifying their portfolios, collaborating with various businesses, and investing in new products, streamers stand to expand their reach and establish entirely new revenue streams.

Advertisement

Some of these ventures have paid off in spades for ambitious content creators: Dr Disrespect can't keep his Black Steel Bourbon on the shelf, while PewDiePie's book became a New York Times bestseller. However, not every streamer product has been a hit, regardless of whether or not the creators in question developed the product or simply served as the face of a company. Some product launches have even resulted in major criticism and backpedaling from the streamer in question. The following are a handful of streamer collabs and product launches that backfired almost immediately.

Logan Paul and KSI's Prime accused of deceptive advertising

Prime Hydration, co-founded by YouTubers/influencers Logan Paul and KSI, offers a wide variety of beverages to the public, with sports drinks and energy drinks being the biggest sales-drivers for the brightly-colored brand. Due to Prime's popularity and ubiquitous advertising campaigns through social media, lawmakers and parents' groups have expressed concerns over the amount of caffeine present in the energy drinks, as well as a worry that consumers might accidentally purchase the energy drinks when they mean to get the hydrating beverages. Add onto the fact that the influencers' primary demo seems to be the younger generation who tune into their channels, and you have a recipe for moral outrage. As a result, Prime drinks have been banned in several regions. Meanwhile, United States Senator Chuck Schumer has called on the FDA to investigate the product and its marketing tactics.

Advertisement

Appearing on an episode of Fox's "Varney & Co," Paul noted that the FDA was not investigating his product in any official capacity. He also disputed the idea that he and KSI were purposefully trying to cause confusion between the two types of Prime. "One is in a can and says 'energy drink' on it. The other is in a bottle. It says 'hydration drink' on it," Paul argued. "One is 18+, the other is suitable for all ages. And we believe we've done as good of a job as we possibly can, differentiating our products."

Valkyrae's RFLCT launch was met with skepticism

As YouTube's top female streamer, Valkyrae typically has a lot of eyes focused on whatever she's doing. Even with that in mind, it was kind of shocking for Valkyrae's fans to see how quickly things went south for her and the skincare line she partnered up with in 2021. Announced on October 19 of that year, RFLCT was billed as a product made specifically for gamers and other folks who spend a lot of time in front of the computer, professing to help combat skin damage caused by blue light pollution. Unfortunately for RFLCT, numerous experts quickly pointed out that there's not much evidence to support the idea that blue light can cause such lasting damage. When RFLCT's official website launched, it failed to present any of the research that the brand claimed to have done when developing the product.

Advertisement

Despite seeming so happy with the announcement of RFLCT, Valkyrae quickly became disillusioned by the brand she helped to found. When fans and critics alike began accusing Valkyrae and RFLCT of trying to scam people, she publicly distanced herself from the product. Valkyrae remained adamant that she had seen RFLCT's research into blue light damage in person, but that the company had failed to inform her it would not be publishing its findings. Though she assured viewers that she still believed in what RFLCT stood for, the controversy had irreversibly tainted her enthusiasm for the entire enterprise. After nearly two weeks of fierce public discourse, RFLCT closed up shop, not even surviving the month of October.

Advertisement

MrBeast Burger goes from bad to worse

MrBeast is best known for his outrageous stunts and giveaways, with some of his biggest videos involving burying himself alive and staging an elaborate recreation of Netflix's "Squid Game." In addition to his massive YouTube channel — which overtook PewDiePie in subscribers in 2023 — he's also branched out into some tastier areas of business. Before he launched his successful Feastables brand of snacks, he entered the fast food arena by partnering with Virtual Dining Concepts to launch MrBeast Burger in 2020. Operating out of ghost kitchens for the first two years before opening a physical location in 2022, the virtual chain helped a number of restaurants make up for lost business amidst COVID-19 restrictions. This relief was short-lived, however, as fans commonly complained about the quality of the food and a lack of availability in their area. Pictures of raw burgers and chicken quickly began to pop up on the internet, as well as stories of MrBeast Burger locations getting shut down for health code violations.

Advertisement

MrBeast Raw
by
u/Enzzagurl in
MrBeast

In 2023, MrBeast posted a few disparaging remarks about his MrBeast Burger contract, telling fans he preferred to focus on Feastables instead. MrBeast then sued Virtual Dining Concepts in August 2023, alleging that the company's lack of quality control had damaged his reputation. VDC filed a $100 million countersuit, claiming that MrBeast had sabotaged their collaboration at every turn. In a statement provided to Variety, VDC said, "When VDC refused to accede to his bullying tactics to give up more of the brand to him, he filed this ill-advised and meritless lawsuit seeking to undermine the MrBeast Burger brand and terminate his existing contractual obligations without cause." The case is still ongoing — as is MrBeast Burger, if you're still hungry.

Advertisement

Pokimane's cookies and 'broke boy' backlash

MrBeast isn't the only creator to get in on the snack game in recent memory, but Pokimane's collaboration with Myna Snacks received much more of an immediate adverse reaction from the public. Teaming up with the health-conscious snack-maker, Pokimane announced the release of Midnight Mini Cookies, a chocolatey dessert sold at $28 for a four-pack. Not only did a large number of viewers balk at the price, but some also accused Pokimane and Myna of ripping off an existing treat, the significantly cheaper Midnight Mini Cookies from Toatzy. Myna and Poki contend that the only major things the two cookie brands have in common is a manufacturer and a similar flavor profile, but the controversy didn't end there.

Advertisement

Pokimane further enraged viewers when she addressed the price of the cookies in a later stream, quipping, "I know math is hard when you're an idiot, but like, if you're a broke boy, just say so." Though she later apologized for the joke, she was met with criticism from viewers and fellow streamers, many of whom felt the remark was a step too far and made her seem out of touch with her audience. Others argued that the whole thing was a total non-issue that the citizens of the internet blew out of proportions (as they are wont to do). Following the back-and-forth, Pokimane has also promised to continue talking with Myna Snacks about ways they might lower the cost of the cookies in the future. And for what it's worth, people seem to think the cookies themselves are pretty good. A taste test by Uproxx's Dane Rivera concluded, "Tasting these cookies makes all the controversy seem even more ridiculous."

Advertisement

Recommended

Advertisement